TAR
Menu

triangle arts review

DPAC's Production of "OKLAHOMA!" Is Daring, Different, and Discombobulating

3/30/2022

8 Comments

 
Picture
The company of the national tour of Rodgers & Hammerstein's OKLAHOMA!. Photo by Matthew Murphy and Evan Zimmerman.
Rodgers and Hammerstein’s Oklahoma! has long been one of those “Broadway standards” that gets performed with impressive frequency, despite its age. As such, most modern viewers are more than familiar with the story of two men, “heroic” Curly (Hunter Hoffman at the opening night performance) and creepy Jud (Christopher Bannow), fighting for the love of one woman, Laurey (Sasha Hutchings) back in 1906. However, the latest production of the show, darkly directed by Daniel Fish and onstage now at the Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC), puts a new spin on the tale and exposes some of the troubling themes and problematic undertones that were there all along.

It's clear right from the start that this is an OKLAHOMA! like no other. Even before the opening, the stage is mostly monotone in color, albeit for a few brightly colored garland banners strung across the top. They create a sort of festive atmosphere, which serves as a nice counterbalance to the production’s dark themes and also makes viewers question what unfolds. Is this really the cheery, funny musical they’ve seen (or at least heard of) countless times before? The new setting, the somber delivery, and the staging say “no,” but yet, much of the story and script remains unchanged. The result is an unsettling but intriguing viewing experience, one that is particularly effective for those acquainted with the show. In their case, Fish has taken something familiar and changed it into something completely new, which is no easy feat.

Similarly, the casting and directorial choices take the characters from stock to startling, allowing viewers to experience them differently than ever before. Ado Annie, for example, is no longer flighty, flirty, and cutesy. Instead, she’s big, bold, and embracing her budding sexuality, thanks to a charming performance by Sis. Likewise, Laurey isn’t a mere prize to be won. Hutchings’ purposefully dry and somber delivery turns her into a brooding, complex character with self-destructive tendencies and a penchant for being drawn toward darkness.

The male characters take on new life as well. Bannow’s perfectly-acted Jud is still scary, but audience members actually care about why. With allusions to self-hatred, struggles with mental illness, and attractions he’s not allowed to explore, Jud becomes an interesting character, not one viewers will root for exactly, but at least one viewers care about and can do more than hate. On the flip side, Curly is no longer just some worthy hero who gets the girl. He’s problematic and somewhat mean-spirited.

Add all of this to a never-changing set, video close-ups of the actors’ faces during tense moments, lights that are either too bright or a pitch-black room, and the result is not just a whole new OKLAHOMA!, but a whole new theatre experience in general. It feels uncomfortable. It feels confusing. It’s shocking. It’s scary. It’s gross. It makes you think. In short, it’s actual art. Daring, discombobulating, and downright trippy at times, the production thrusts viewers not just into a new state, but into a new way of thinking of this and other classic musical scripts. It’s more than just a reimagining; it’s a genre-questioning reinvention made for the modern age.

One thing, and only one thing, is for certain. Viewers need to leave their expectations at the door. This is an OKLAHOMA! that surprises, astounds, and leaves plenty of room for thought. It’s important, effective, and unforgettable, the sort of show that will be go down in theatre history and be talked about for years to come.

8 Comments
kimberly
4/1/2022 08:31:16 am

This performance was the WORST I have ever seen. My group of friends and I spoke afterward and wished we had just gotten up and left. We kept thinking it would get better but WOKE la homa is right and it basically destroyed a wholesome musical. Write your own dramas instead of piggy backing on someone else's talent.

Reply
Michael Bink
4/4/2022 11:10:26 am

Couldn't agree more

Reply
Victoria Bradsher
4/2/2022 07:14:41 pm

I agree - we left as did most of the theater. Without a doubt a waste of time. High schools do this better than this drival!

Reply
Michael Bink
4/4/2022 11:11:06 am

We did also.

Reply
Gail Hignight
4/3/2022 08:30:49 am

I agree the show was not well received. Myself and the group I came with, sadly did not like the show at all and were glad when it ended. But, I was just as disappointed with the crowd. After the show ended, many, many people were getting up and leaving- not even
bothering to give the actors a round of applause.....while the actors were still on stage! The actors worked so hard to present a show that was filled with alot of singing and dancing and we gave them little appreciation, just disrespect. Not cool people!

Reply
Michael Bink
4/4/2022 11:14:06 am

I am sure that this is not the first stop that they had that had the same reaction to this travesty of a musical. Truly not good advertising putting Rogers and Hammerstein as the Playbill.
We left at the first Intermission and the very dark Act, just odd writing.

Reply
Michael Bink
4/4/2022 11:16:57 am

As with the other comments, we had the same reaction. Left at the first Intermission, along with at least half of the audience. This was a misleading playbill. Even DPAC employees were commenting on the reactions from other attendees.

Truly a waste of an hour drive, money and time. At least my dinner near the DPAC was good.

Reply
Ken Pugh
4/5/2022 07:31:43 am

I read a review that suggested the director wanted to have lines spoken without emotion. That is explains why the dialog sounded like amateurs were performing it. The cast was doing their best within that constraint. The actors did have fun with the parts such as goodbye kissing, arithmetic, laughing and the death scene. Jud had a comic death (helping Curley cock the gun, walking a bit after being shot and then lying down)

The “dance” at the beginning of the second act was the most painful ten minutes of sight and sound that I have experienced at DPAC. The “music” made me cover my ears. One person I talked to afterwards had been a modern dancer and she said that it was the worst she had seen.

This was not “Rodgers & Hammerstein’s Oklahoma” as the playbill reads. This was “Oklahoma” in words only. If it had been advertised as that, the reactions might have been different.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    TAR

    We love the arts. We write about them. Founded 2018.

    Archives

    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018

    Categories

    All
    5 Questions
    Book Reviews
    Burning Coal
    Carolina Ballet
    Cary Players
    Concert Reviews
    Dance
    DPAC
    Durham Performing Arts Center
    Forest Moon Theater
    "From The Pit" By Michael Macsuga
    Harnett Regional Theatre
    High School Theatre
    July 2021
    Koka Booth Amphitheatre
    Music
    NCT
    NC Theatre
    Neuse Little Theatre
    North Carolina Theatre
    North Raleigh Arts & Creative Theatre
    PlayMakers Repertory Company
    Press Releases
    Raleigh Dance Theatre
    Raleigh Little Theatre
    ShaLeigh Dance Works
    Theatre In The Park
    Theatre Raleigh
    Theatre Reviews

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact